|
Breed Information and Type
The
Importance of Type in Rocky Mountain Horses
D. Phillip Sponenberg, DVM, PhD
"Type" is a difficult concept to define, but is an absolutely
vital one when talking about breeds of livestock. One definition
of type is the conformational peculiarities that separate one
breed from another. It is safe to add that "type" almost
represents the ideal mental picture of a breed. Type is therefore
central to a breed's character and identity, and it is what sets
the different breeds apart one from another. Quarter Horses have
a "type", and Spanish Mustangs a different "type".
Even closely related breeds, such as the Peruvian Paso and the
Spanish Mustang, have subtle differences in type that help distinguish
one from the other. Likewise, Rocky Mountain Horses are a different
type that Saddlebreds and Tennessee Walking Horses, but only subtly
different from the closely related Mountain Pleasure Horse.
The Rocky Mountain Horse comes to us today as an interesting amalgam
of a few different strains and sources of founder horses. One
result of the base upon which the breed is founded is that there
are at least subtly different types within the Rocky Mountain
breed. Even at the extremes within the breed there are some consistent
conformational traits that set Rocky Mountain Horses off from
other horses, and these conformational traits are essential to
the typiness of the breed. Horses that exhibit all of the conformational
peculiarities of the breed are said to be "typier" than
those that have fewer.
Breeders of any breed need to be aware of type and what it is.
Within every breed some individuals are going to be born that
are "off type". The fate of these individuals has an
important impact on the fate of the breed. If these animals are
heralded and used widely as breeding stock, the breed's type will
slowly erode until the original breed is unrecognizable. If, on
the other hand, "off type" individuals are culled from
breeding, then the original type can be preserved.
Modern horse breeds in America can give good lessons in the importance
of type, and the ability of breeders to change type. One example
is the Morgan horse. The original Morgan was a dual-purpose farm
chunk, valued for its durability and for its strength. Fashion
has changed some strains of Morgan away from the original model
into more of a refined show horse. Some of this was done by crossbreeding,
but much of it was done by selecting away from the original type.
This has been done to the extent that the original type is now
quite rare, and its breeders concerned about its extinction.
Draft breeds, such as the American Belgian and Clydesdale, are
other good examples of the ability of type to change. Originally
these were massive, stocky heavy horses with great bulk. They
were used for agricultural work. The modern use for these is usually
for parade use, and this has favored a much leggier, refined type.
The original type is rare. So which one is the "real"
breed - the modern type or the original? This is an important
question in breed conservation, and has no easy answer.
Type in beef cattle breeds has seen even larger changes than has
that in horse breeds - and swine probably have changed type the
most of any species of livestock. All of this has helped the breeds
in question to adapt to current demands, although in the process
the result has been that all breeds tend to start looking very
alike. Without the distinctiveness of breeds there is less chance
for any breed to really fit a specialized niche, as they all become
generalists.
Breeders of Rocky Mountain Horses need to ponder the importance
of type to the breed. If type is important, then it needs to become
the responsibility of every breeder to breed toward the breed
type. This is especially important in the Rocky Mountain Horse
which sits between the Spanish horses and the other North American
gaited breeds. If the Rocky Mountain Horse becomes nothing more
than another Spanish breed, or at the other extreme, another Saddle
Horse, then what is the value in having it as a distinct breed?
My own bias is to conserve the Rocky Mountain Horse as a unique
genetic resource - and this means that its type should be different
than other breeds. The historic type of Rocky Mountain Horse has
been very successful - it does not need to be changed.
D.Phillip Sponenberg, DVM, PhD
Professor, Pathology and Genetics
Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA 24061
USA
|